Mariela Leiva v. José Mario Honecker et al Mariela Leiva v. José Mario Honecker et al Case nature : Criminal court Plaintiffs types : Neighbours Defendants : José Mario Honecker, owner of the rice field, Erminio Rodríguez, chairman of Villaguay Aero Litoral S.A., César Martín Visconti, airplane pilot Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Not specified Complaint date : July 4, 2017 Place of jurisdiction : Argentina, Concepción del Uruguay, Entre Rios Summary : A rice producer, the chairman of an aviation company and a pilot are condamned to 1.5 years of suspended jail for having sprayed pesticides in the vicinity of elementary school… See details >>
UNAF v. Minister of Agriculture UNAF v. Minister of Agriculture Case nature : Administrative Plaintiffs types : Beekeepers/Honey Producers Defendants : Ministère de l'Alimentation, de l'Agriculture et de la Pêche Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Insecticide, Sulfoxaflor, Flupyradifuron Complaint date : July 11, 2018 Place of jurisdiction : France, Paris Summary : The Administrative Court having rejected UNAF request for documents relating to the French position on the use of neonicotinoids , it lodged an… See details >>
Verger Messier v. Ferdinand Berner Verger Messier v. Ferdinand Berner Case nature : Civil court Plaintiffs types : Farmers Defendants : Ferdinand Berner Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Not specified Complaint date : No description Place of jurisdiction : Canada, Quebec Summary : The plaintiff is an apple producer who claims that the organic farming practices of her neighbor force her to use more chemical pesticides… See details >>
PHYTOPHAR v. Wallonne Region PHYTOPHAR v. Wallonne Region Case nature : Administrative Plaintiffs types : Economic stakeholders Defendants : Wallonne Region Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Herbicide, Glyphosate Complaint date : June 26, 2017 Place of jurisdiction : Belgium, Brussels Summary : Plaintiff appeals to the Council of State against the Wallonne order of March 2017, which bans the use of glyphosate-based herbicides…. See details >>
Blitz v. Monsanto Blitz v. Monsanto Case nature : Civil court Plaintiffs types : Individuals Defendants : Monsanto, Scotts Miracle-Gro Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Herbicide, Roundup, Glyphosate Complaint date : June 20, 2017 Place of jurisdiction : United States, Western District of Wisconsin Summary : 6.20.2017, lawsuit is filed about the unlawful promotion, marketing, and sale of various Roundup Products, with the false statement that Roundup’s active ingredient, glyphosate, targets an enzyme that is not found “in people or pets.”… See details >>