T. Dalhuisen v. Monsanto Reference : 2012/00876 Complaint date : September 21, 2012 Status : Final judgment Place of jurisdiction : Netherlands, Amsterdam Plaintiffs types : Individuals Plaintiffs names : Tjerk Dalhuisen Defendants : Monsanto Lawyers for Health and Environmental Justice : No description Case nature : Administrative Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Herbicide, Glyphosate, Roundup, AMPA Requests : Decide that the disputed statement in the glyphosate advertisement is contrary to the advertising code; require Monsanto to make a correction in the Telegraaf and Volkskrant newspapers; inform the national media of the Committee's decision. Name of the Court : Advertising Code Committee (Reclame Code Commissie) of Amsterdam, Netherlands Jurisdiction level : Decision date : December 11, 2012 Decision nature : Partially Positive Decision content : The Committee considers that the advertising in question is contrary to Articles 2 and 3 of the Advertising Code and recommends that the advertiser no longer advertise in this way. For the rest, the complaint is rejected. Legal basis : Court Ruling : Link to the ruling Summary : T. Dalhuisen files a complaint against Monsanto with the Advertising Code Committee for misleading advertising claiming that glyphosate had no effect on soil. Scientific references : No scientifice reference for this case. Related links : Klacht tegen advertentie Monsanto “Roundup, de feiten’ (Complaint against Monsanto) (NL) Monsanto accepts the opinion of the Advertising Advisory Committee: the Roundup advertisement was misleading (NL)