< Back to research Rural Coalition et al v. EPA et al Reference : 20-73220 Complaint date : October 30, 2020 Status : Not judged Place of jurisdiction : United States, Washington, DC Plaintiffs types : Farmers, Environmental NGOs, Health/Food groups Plaintiffs names : Rural Coalition, Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA), Beyond Pesticides, Center for Biological Diversity (CBD), Center for Food Safety (CFS) Defendants : EPA, Andrew Wheeler Lawyers : Stephanie M. Parent, George A. Kimbrell, Sylvia Shih-Yau Wu Case nature : Administrative Specificities : Application for judicial review Products : Herbicide, Atrazine, Simazine, Propazine Requests : Set aside the Interim Registrations for atrazine, propazine and simazine; grant relief as may be necessary and appropriate to stop the use and sale of pesticides authorized by the Interim Registrations after vacatur. Name of the Court : United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit of Washington, DC, United States Jurisdiction level : Appellate (Appeal) Court Summary : Civil society groups petition the Court to review the orders of the EPA approving the interim registration review decisions for the herbicides atrazine, propazine, and simazine. Petitioners allege that EPA violated its duties under FIFRA in approving the Interim Registrations, and that the Interim Registrations lack support in substantial evidence. See also case 3:11-cv-00293-JCS that ordered EPA to assess the risks that atrazine, propazine, and simazine pose to protected plants and animals. In Nov. 2020, the draft Biological Evaluation (BE) assessing risks to listed species from labeled uses of atrazine shows it is causing massive harm to endangered species. Similar draft evaluations for simazine and propazine were also released. Scientific references : No scientifice reference for this case. Related links : Petition for review, Oct. 30, 2020 Lawsuit Challenges EPA Reapproval of Endocrine-disrupting Pesticide Atrazine