Global 2000 v. BfR and EFSA Reference : 246 Js 1470/17 Complaint date : December 4, 2017 Status : Final judgment Place of jurisdiction : Germany, Berlin Plaintiffs types : Environmental NGOs Plaintiffs names : Global 2000 Defendants : BfR (German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment), EFSA Lawyers for Health and Environmental Justice : Josef Unterweger Case nature : Criminal court Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Herbicide, Glyphosate, Roundup Requests : Court recognition of fraud, bodily harm, public poisoning, soil and water contamination, and unauthorized exploitation of copyrighted works. Name of the Court : Public Prosecutor's Office (Staatanwaltschaft) of Berlin, Germany Jurisdiction level : No description Decision date : June 14, 2018 Decision nature : Negative Decision content : The Prosecutor considers that the criminal complaint does not give rise to the initial suspicion of a criminal offence, so no investigation is necessary. Legal basis : Court Ruling : Link to the ruling Summary : Global 2000 complains against BfR and EFSA to the Berlin Prosecutor because the renewal of the glyphosate authorisation by the European Commission is based on a BfR report which is a plagiarism of the conclusions of the glyphosate lobby. The prosecutor dismisses the complaint. Scientific references : No scientifice reference for this case. Related links : No related link for this case.