Croplife Canada v. City of Toronto Reference : 31036 (198 O.A.C. 35) 03-CV-251020CM1 Complaint date : June 23, 2003 Status : Final judgment Place of jurisdiction : Canada, Toronto Plaintiffs types : Economic stakeholders Plaintiffs names : Croplife Canada Defendants : Public collectivities Lawyers for Health and Environmental Justice : No description Case nature : Civil court Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Herbicide, , Fungicide Requests : Croplife Canada is seeking the annulment of Regulation No. 456-2003 on the ground that it is constitutionally inoperative under the doctrine of federal paramountcy because it is contrary to a federal legislative objective. Name of the Court : Court of Appeals of Toronto, Canada Jurisdiction level : Decision date : May 13, 2005 Decision nature : Decision content : L'appel est rejeté. Legal basis : Court Ruling : Link to the ruling Summary : Croplife Canada is seeking the cancellation of the City of Toronto's By-law No. 456-2003 regarding the use of pesticides within the city limits, as it contravenes the purpose of the Pest Control Products Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. P-9 by denying Canadians the benefits that the federal system is intended to provide. Croplife's application was dismissed on 8/12/2003, as was its appeal of that decision on 7/1/2004. On 17/11/2005, the application for leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal decision (C41220) was dismissed with costs. See 114957 Canada Ltée (Spraytech) v. Town of Hudson. Scientific references : No scientifice reference for this case. Related links : Supreme Court of Canada (ANG) Applications for Leave: Croplife Canada v. Toronto (City)