CBD v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

3:15-cv-658-JCS
February 12, 2015
Final judgment
United States, San Francisco

Environmental NGOs
Center for Biological Diversity (CBD)
Fish and Wildlife Service, Sally Jewell, Dan Ashe, Department of the Interior
Collette Adkins, Justin Augustine

Administrative
Civil action for injunctive and declaratory relief
Atrazine, 2,4-D, Herbicide, Alachlor
injunctive and declaratory relief, including an order compelling FWS to complete the consultations and placing restrictions on pesticide use to prevent jeopardy to the listed species until consultation is completed.
United States District Court for the Northern District of California of San Francisco, United States

February 19, 2016
Positive
Settlement: FWS will analyze the impacts of atrazine and glyphosate, the two most commonly used pesticides in the US, on 1,500 endangered U.S. plants and animals and develop conservation measures on these two pesticides, along with propazine and simazine, which together represent nearly 40 percent of annual pesticide use in the United States.
No description

CBD files a lawsuit against the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for failing to ensure atrazine, 2,4-D and alachlor, three widely used pesticides, don't jeopardize the survival of the delta smelt and Alameda whipsnake, two Bay Area endangered species. A settlement is reached, by which FWS will analyze the impacts of atrazine and glyphosate, the two most commonly used pesticides in the US, on 1,500 endangered U.S. plants and animals and develop conservation measures on these two pesticides, along with propazine and simazine, which together represent nearly 40 percent of annual pesticide use in the United States. As a result of the settlement, the EPA released a draft biological evaluation on 11/25/2020 finding that glyphosate is likely to injure or kill 93% of the plants and animals protected under the Endangered Species Act.