Toxin Free USA v. CAVA Groupe inc. Toxin Free USA v. CAVA Groupe inc. Case nature : Civil court Plaintiffs types : Environmental NGOs Defendants : Company Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Glyphosate, Herbicide, Piperonyl Butoxide, Other Complaint date : October 13, 2023 Place of jurisdiction : United States, Columbia Summary : On 13 October 2023, the NGO Toxin Free USA filed a complaint before the Superior Court of the District of Columbia in the United States… See details >>
Wartels et al v. Administrator Wartels et al v. Administrator Case nature : Administrative Plaintiffs types : Individuals Defendants : State Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Other, Insecticid Complaint date : No description Place of jurisdiction : Canada Summary : On September 22, 2023, the Environmental Appeal Board rejected a request to cancel the authorization to spray Foray 48B, a bacillus thuringiensis insecticide, in the… See details >>
California Department of Pesticide Regulation v. Agra Fly et al. California Department of Pesticide Regulation v. Agra Fly et al. Case nature : Civil court Plaintiffs types : Governments Defendants : Company Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Herbicide, Glyphosate, Malathion, Azoxystrobin, Difenoconazole, Bifenthrin, Other Complaint date : September 28, 2023 Place of jurisdiction : United States, Kern, California Summary : On 19 October 2023, the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Kern, issued a decision temporarily suspending the aerial pesticide spraying activities… See details >>
PAN Europe et al v. State of Belgium PAN Europe et al v. State of Belgium Case nature : EU court Plaintiffs types : Environmental NGOs, Beekeepers/Honey Producers Defendants : State of Belgium Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Neonicotinoid, Clothianidin, Thiamethoxam Complaint date : February 16, 2021 Place of jurisdiction : European Union, Luxembourg Summary : On 17 October 2023, the Belgian Council of State annulled the six decisions authorising the use of insecticides based on “neonicotinoid” active substances banned in the European Union, for the treatment, marketing and sowing… See details >>
State of Rio Grande v. Sindiveg State of Rio Grande v. Sindiveg Case nature : Constitutional Plaintiffs types : State Defendants : Other Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Neonicotinoid, Insecticid, Imidacloprid, Thiamethoxam, Clothianidin Complaint date : No description Place of jurisdiction : Brazil, Brasilia Summary : On October 17, 2023, the Superior Court of Justice rejected the exceptional appeal lodged by the Federated State of Rio Grande for the annulment of… See details >>