PAN EU et al v. State of Belgium PAN EU et al v. State of Belgium Case nature : Administrative Plaintiffs types : Environmental NGOs, Individuals, Beekeepers/Honey Producers Defendants : State of Belgium Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Insecticide, Neonicotinoid, Thiamethoxam, Clothianidin, Cruiser, Cruiser 600 FS, Poncho Beta Complaint date : January 21, 2019 Place of jurisdiction : Belgium, Brussels Summary : By a request filed on January 21, 2019, the associations PAN Europe and Nature et Progrès Belgium and Benoît Dupret request, on the one hand, the annulment… See details >>
Alesi et al v. Monsanto Alesi et al v. Monsanto Case nature : Civil court Plaintiffs types : Individuals Defendants : Monsanto Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Herbicide, Roundup, Glyphosate Complaint date : No description Place of jurisdiction : United States, Missouri Summary : As a direct and proximate result of their exposure to Roundup herbicide and its reactive ingredient, glyphosate, plaintiffs developed non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (NHL). They sue Monsanto… See details >>
Pollinis v. European Commission Pollinis v. European Commission Case nature : EU court Plaintiffs types : Environmental NGOs Defendants : European Commission Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Other Complaint date : December 18, 2018 Place of jurisdiction : European Union, Strasbourg Summary : The French NGO Pollinis referred to the European Ombudsman for public access to documents containing the positions of Member States within the SCoPAFF (Standing Committee… See details >>
Global 2000 et al v. BfR and EFSA Global 2000 et al v. BfR and EFSA Case nature : Criminal court Plaintiffs types : Environmental NGOs Defendants : BfR (German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment), EFSA Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Herbicide, Glyphosate, Roundup Complaint date : December 4, 2017 Place of jurisdiction : Austria, Vienna Summary : BFR and EFSA have violated their duty to take an independent, objective, transparent and scientifically sound decision on the assessment of the application for extension of the authorisation of glyphosate…. See details >>
Arysta LifeScience Netherlands v. European Commission Arysta LifeScience Netherlands v. European Commission Case nature : EU court Plaintiffs types : Economic stakeholders Defendants : European Commission Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Insecticide, Diflubenzuron Complaint date : September 4, 2017 Place of jurisdiction : European Union, Luxembourg Summary : The applicant, a manufacturer of diflubenzuron products, seeks on 27/7/2017 the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/855… See details >>