Stéphane Rouxel v. N.N.A.

Reference :

No description

Complaint date :

January 11, 2012

Status :

Final judgment

Place of jurisdiction :

France, Côtes d'Armor

Plaintiffs types :

Farm/rural workers

Plaintiffs names :

Stéphane Rouxel

Defendants :

Nutrea Nutrition Animale (N.N.A),

Lawyers for Health and Environmental Justice :

François Lafforgue

Case nature :

Social court

Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) :

, Nuvagrain, K-obiol

Requests :

The plaintiff seeks recognition of the inexcusable misconduct of his employer which resulted in two work-related accidents that he suffered.

Name of the Court :

Court of Social Security Affairs of Côtes d'Armor, France

Jurisdiction level :

Decision date :

September 11, 2014

Decision nature :

Partially Positive

Decision content :

The court declares the inexcusable fault of the NNA Company on a single work accident and orders an expert to examine the victim. An increased annuity is paid to the plaintiff.

Legal basis :

Court Ruling :

Link to the ruling

Summary :

The plaintiff asked the court to say that the workplace injury suffered by him was the result of his employer's inexcusable misconduct.

Scientific references :

No scientifice reference for this case.