Downs v. Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Reference : [2008] EWHC 2666 (Admin) Complaint date : September 16, 2004 Status : Provisional judgment Place of jurisdiction : United Kingdom, London Plaintiffs types : Neighbours Plaintiffs names : Georgina Downs Defendants : Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) Lawyers for Health and Environmental Justice : Michael Fordham, Emma Dixon Case nature : Administrative Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Other Requests : Recognize that DEFRA had not acted in compliance with EU Directive 91/414 since the domestic regime did not provide for the necessary protection of public health. Name of the Court : High Court of Justice of London, United Kingdom Jurisdiction level : Decision date : November 14, 2008 Decision nature : Positive Decision content : The judge said "defects" in Defra's approach to pesticide safety contravened a 1991 EC directive. Legal basis : Court Ruling : Link to the ruling Summary : The plaintiff, a rural person living next to fields, has developed many illnesses due to pesticides spraying and seeks recognition that the UK government’s methods used in the approval of pesticides do not live up to the standards required by the relevant EC Directive 91/414. 11.14.2008 judgment confirms her claims, but DEFRA appealed and judgment was reversed on 07.07.2009 ([2009] EWCA Civ 664). Scientific references : No scientifice reference for this case. Related links : Factual evidence and arguments relied upon in Georgina's Judicial Review legal case Campaigner wins seven-year battle to force rethink on use of pesticides Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs v. Downs [2009] EWCA Civ 664