Castillo v. E I Dupont et al Reference : 93-14199 3D96-2486 3D96-2489 SC00-490 Complaint date : February 17, 1997 Status : Final judgment Place of jurisdiction : United States, Florida Plaintiffs types : Individuals Plaintiffs names : John Castillo, a minor by and through her mother, Donna Castillo, Juan Castillo Defendants : Dupont De Nemours, Pine Island Farms Lawyers for Health and Environmental Justice : James L. Ferraro, Elizabeth K. Russo, Ana Rivero, Philip D. Parrish, Joel S. Perwin Case nature : Civil court Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Benlate, Benomyl, Fungicide Requests : Prove the link between Mrs Castillo' exposure to benlate during pregnancy and his child's malformations. Name of the Court : Supreme Court of Florida, United States Jurisdiction level : Decision date : July 10, 2003 Decision nature : Positive Decision content : The supreme court quashes the Third District's decision that excluded plaintiff's expert testimony. Legal basis : Court Ruling : Link to the ruling Summary : Plaintiffs sue DuPont, manufacturer of fungicide Benlate (active ingredient benomyl), which they allege caused their child's teratogenic birth defects, due to the mother's exposure while pregnant, in 1993. On June 7, 1996, Circuit Court (Dade County, Florida) considers that Dupont and Pine Island are responsible for the malformations of Castillo's child and awards $4 million; DuPont 99.5 %, Pine Island 0.5%. The companies appeal the Final Judgment entered on the denial of their motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and/or new trial. On February 9, 2000, the District Court of Appeal of Florida holds that plaintiffs' scientific evidence, and the conclusions it embraces, should have been excluded, as the methodology used to obtain them is not generally accepted in the relevant scientific community, reverses the final judgments entered against the companies ands remand with directions to enter judgments for the defendants. On July 10, 2003 , the Supreme Court of Florida quashes the District Court of Appeal decision. Scientific references : No scientifice reference for this case. Related links : DuPont Faces Recent Benlate Losses On Health And Plant Damage Claims EI Dupont De Nemours v. Castillo Ex Rel. Castillo, 748 So. 2d 1108 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000) District Court of Appeal of Florida Mother of Baby Born With No Eyes Wins Legal Battle With Company That Was Responsible DuPont Responsible for Birth Defects DuPont Grapples With Legacy of Benlate