Chaplick et al v. Monsanto Chaplick et al v. Monsanto Case nature : Civil court Plaintiffs types : Individuals Defendants : Monsanto Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Herbicide, Glyphosate, Roundup Complaint date : March 12, 2018 Place of jurisdiction : United States, Saint Louis, Missouri Summary : The plaintiffs allege that they developed non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) as a result of their exposure to Roundup,… See details >>
Région de Bruxelles-Capitale v. Commission Région de Bruxelles-Capitale v. Commission Case nature : Administrative Plaintiffs types : Local authorities Defendants : European Commission Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Herbicide, Glyphosate Complaint date : March 8, 2018 Place of jurisdiction : European Union, Luxembourg Summary : The region of Brussels sues the European Commission for its decision to renew the authorisation of glyphosate for 5 years…. See details >>
Client Earth and PAN Europe v. EFSA and European Commission Client Earth and PAN Europe v. EFSA and European Commission Case nature : EU court Plaintiffs types : Environmental NGOs Defendants : EFSA, European Commission Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Insecticide, Fungicide, Herbicide Complaint date : November 27, 2013 Place of jurisdiction : European Union, Luxembourg Summary : 02.10.2011. EFSA refuses an application for access to certain working documents relating to a guidance document, prepared by EFSA, for the benefit of applicants for authorisation to place plant protection products on the market… See details >>
Associazione Nazionale Granosalus v. European Commission Associazione Nazionale Granosalus v. European Commission Case nature : EU court Plaintiffs types : Economic stakeholders Defendants : European Commission Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Herbicide, Glyphosate, Roundup Complaint date : February 28, 2018 Place of jurisdiction : European Union, Luxembourg Summary : The complainant is pursuing the regulation renewing the approval of glyphosate, adopted by the European Commission…. See details >>
Mrs. B… v. INRA Mrs. B… v. INRA Case nature : Administrative Plaintiffs types : Technicians and Professional users Defendants : French National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA) Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Insecticide, Benzene, Fastac, Decis Protech Complaint date : February 28, 2014 Place of jurisdiction : France, Clermont-Ferrand Summary : The complainant seeks the annulment of INRA’s refusal to acknowledge that her father’s pathology was attributable to pesticide exposure during her professional career. This motion is denied. The… See details >>