McCarty et al v. Arkansas State Plant Board et al McCarty et al v. Arkansas State Plant Board et al Case nature : Civil court Plaintiffs types : Farmers Defendants : Arkansas State Plant Board Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Herbicide, Dicamba, Xtendimax, Fexapan, Engenia Complaint date : November 10, 2017 Place of jurisdiction : United States, Arkansas, Pulaski County Summary : 03.31.2018, the judge ruled that the 6 farmers can spray Dicamba-based herbicides that were blamed for hurting millions of acres of U.S. crops… See details >>
Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs v. Downs Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs v. Downs Case nature : Administrative Plaintiffs types : Government or State Assessment Agencies Defendants : Individual Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Other Complaint date : September 16, 2004 Place of jurisdiction : United Kingdom, London Summary : DEFRA files an appeal against a decision that the Secretary of State had erred in his approach to applying Council Directive (EEC) 91-414,… See details >>
ASPAS v. Ministers ASPAS v. Ministers Case nature : Administrative Plaintiffs types : Environmental NGOs Defendants : Ministère de l'Alimentation, de l'Agriculture et de la Pêche, Ministère de la Santé et des Solidarités, Ministère de l’Économie, des Finances et de l'Industrie, Ministère de l’Écologie et du Développement Durable Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Rodenticide, Bromadiolone, Scilliroside, Chlorophacinone Complaint date : September 22, 2003 Place of jurisdiction : France, Paris Summary : ASPAS and FNE challenged the inter-ministerial decision authorizing the use of bromadiolone, scilliroside and chlorophacinone rodenticides… See details >>
PHYTERON 2000 et al v. Minister of Agriculture and Fischeries PHYTERON 2000 et al v. Minister of Agriculture and Fischeries Case nature : Administrative Plaintiffs types : Economic stakeholders Defendants : Ministère de l'Alimentation, de l'Agriculture et de la Pêche Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Herbicide, Naprophyt, Napropamide Complaint date : July 7, 2007 Place of jurisdiction : France, Paris Summary : The plaintiffs challenge the Minister’s decision to withdraw the authorisation for the placing on the French market of the pesticide Naprophyt,… See details >>
BASF v. Minister for Agriculture and Fisheries BASF v. Minister for Agriculture and Fisheries Case nature : Administrative Plaintiffs types : Economic stakeholders Defendants : Ministère de l'Alimentation, de l'Agriculture et de la Pêche Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Insecticide, Fenbutatin oxyde, Gemm Complaint date : May 7, 2008 Place of jurisdiction : France, Paris Summary : BASF challenges the decisions of the Minister of Agriculture to withdraw the marketing authorisation for the insecticides Gemm and Torque S,… See details >>