Syngenta Crop Protection v. European Commission Syngenta Crop Protection v. European Commission Case nature : EU court Plaintiffs types : Economic stakeholders Defendants : European Commission Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Insecticid, Neonicotinoid, Thiamethoxam Complaint date : August 14, 2013 Place of jurisdiction : European Union, Luxembourg Summary : Syngenta challenges the Commission Decision of 24/5/2013 prohibiting the use of the active substances clothianidin, thiamethoxam and imidacloprid… See details >>
Public Prosecutor and SAS Nora v. 12 Faucheurs Volontaires Public Prosecutor and SAS Nora v. 12 Faucheurs Volontaires Case nature : Criminal court Plaintiffs types : Justice, Individuals Defendants : Environmental NGOs, Individual Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Herbicide, Glyphosate, Roundup Complaint date : No description Place of jurisdiction : France, Béziers Summary : 12 Voluntary Reapers are prosecuted for degrading glyphosate weedkiller cans in local stores…. See details >>
Axon et al v. Citrus World et al Axon et al v. Citrus World et al Case nature : Civil court Plaintiffs types : Individuals Defendants : Citrus World, Inc, Florida’s Natural Growers, Inc Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Glyphosate Complaint date : July 20, 2018 Place of jurisdiction : United States, Brooklyn, New York Summary : Plaintiff files a Class Action Complaint against Citrus World and Florida’s Natural Growers for misleading advertising and labelling because their so-called “natural” orange juices contain glyphosate…. See details >>
Tweedale v. EFSA Tweedale v. EFSA Case nature : EU court Plaintiffs types : Individuals Defendants : EFSA Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Herbicide, Glyphosate Complaint date : October 9, 2014 Place of jurisdiction : European Union, Luxembourg Summary : The plaintiff requests that the court finds that EFSA violated the Aarhus Convention by failing to recognise its obligation to provide information concerning emissions into the environment. On March 7,… See details >>
OCA v. Ben & Jerry’s OCA v. Ben & Jerry’s Case nature : Civil court Plaintiffs types : Consumer Protection Organizations Defendants : Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc., Conopco, Inc. Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Glyphosate, Roundup, Herbicide, AMPA Complaint date : July 9, 2018 Place of jurisdiction : United States, District of Columbia Summary : OCA brings this action regarding the deceptive labeling, marketing, and sale of Unilever’s Ben & Jerry’s Ice Cream Products as humanely sourced and environmentally responsible, despite the fact that ingredients are sourced from inhumane dairy farms and some of the Products contain traces of glyphosate…. See details >>