Investors v. Bayer Investors v. Bayer Case nature : Civil court Plaintiffs types : Economic stakeholders Defendants : Bayer Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Glyphosate Complaint date : December 30, 2021 Place of jurisdiction : Germany, Cologne (Köln) Summary : Investors believe that Bayer violated its obligations related to the law on capital markets in its 2018 acquisition of Monsanto by failing to adequately inform them about the financial risks… See details >>
CBD et al v. EPA CBD et al v. EPA Case nature : Administrative Plaintiffs types : Environmental NGOs, Health/Food groups Defendants : EPA Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Insecticide, Cyantraniliprole (CTP) Complaint date : December 21, 2021 Place of jurisdiction : United States, Washington Summary : Two Conservation groups file a lawsuit against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for failing to comply with a court order requiring it to protect endangered species from the toxic insecticide cyantraniliprole…. See details >>
CFS et al v. EPA CFS et al v. EPA Case nature : Administrative Plaintiffs types : Health/Food groups, Environmental NGOs Defendants : EPA, Michael S. Regan Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Insecticide, Neonicotinoid Complaint date : December 14, 2021 Place of jurisdiction : United States, San Francisco Summary : With no answer to a 2017 legal rulemaking petition calling on EPA to close a regulatory loophole that allows seeds coated with systemic pesticides (coated seeds) to evade the registration and labeling requirements… See details >>
Armando Lazo Bautista V. Ivanhoé Faille Armando Lazo Bautista V. Ivanhoé Faille Case nature : Administrative Plaintiffs types : Farm/rural workers Defendants : Farmers Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Herbicide, Insecticide, Organophosphate, Fungicide Complaint date : No description Place of jurisdiction : Canada, Québec Summary : In a judgment of December 3, 2021, the Administrative Labor Court of Richelieu-Salaberry recognized the non-Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosed in August 2016 in Armando Lazo Bautista,… See details >>
State of Washington v. Amazon.com State of Washington v. Amazon.com Case nature : Arbitration court Plaintiffs types : Governments Defendants : Amazon.com Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Restricted Use Pesticides (RUPs), General Use Pesticides (GUPs) Complaint date : November 22, 2021 Place of jurisdiction : United States, State of Washington Summary : Seattle-based online retailer Amazon will pay $2.5 million for selling highly regulated pesticides on its online platform without a license and without collecting information about their use as required by law…. See details >>