Shelton v. Monsanto Reference : 1816-CV17026 Complaint date : No description Status : Final judgment Place of jurisdiction : United States, Kansas City (Missouri) Plaintiffs types : Individuals Plaintiffs names : Allan Shelton Defendants : Monsanto Lawyers for Health and Environmental Justice : David Wool, Mr. Frazer, James G. Onder, W. Wylie Blair, Mark E. Berns, Benjamin L. Crump, T. Roe Frazer II, Patrick McMurtray, Thomas Roe Frazer III, Shawn Foster, Thomas J. Preuss, Richard Monroe Paul, Laura Catherine Fellows, Ashlea G. Schwartz, James D. O' Leary, James T. Corrigan Case nature : Civil court Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Roundup, Glyphosate, Herbicide Requests : Plaintiff seeks recovery for damages as a result of developing Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma caused by the use of Roundup herbicides. Name of the Court : Circuit Court of Jackson County of Kansas City (Missouri), United States Jurisdiction level : Decision date : June 9, 2022 Decision nature : Negative Decision content : Jury dismissed claims by plaintiff, agreeing with the company that the weed killer was not the source of the man’s disease. Legal basis : Court Ruling : No description Summary : Shelton suffers from non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and alleges that exposure to Monsanto’s Roundup weed killer, and other company herbicide brands made with glyphosate, caused him to develop NHL. On January 1, 2022, he served a trial subpoena on Former Monsanto CEO, Mr. Hugh Grant, commanding that he appear for the February 1, 2022 trial to testify. On January 11, 2022, Mr. Grant filed a motion for a protective order barring Plaintiff from subpoenaing him to testify at trial. On March 9, 2022, Plaintiff filed a trial subpoena commanding Mr. Grant to appear and give trial testimony on May 6, 2022. On March 31, 2022, Respondent denied Mr. Grant’s motion for a protective order and ordered Mr. Grant to appear and give testimony in the May 2, 2022 trial of the claims of Plaintiff Allan Shelton. On April 8, 2022, Mr Grant appeals and requests that the Missouri Court of Appeals issue a preliminary order in and permanent writ of prohibition directing Respondent to take no further action other than granting Relator’s motion for a protective order in full and quashing Plaintiffs’ trial subpoena. Monsanto lawyers say the Court should issue a writ of prohibition barring Respondent from doing anything other than granting Relator’s motion for a protective order in full. On Apr. 15, 2022 the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District denied Grant's petition. On May 3, 2022, trial starts in Kansans City. On June 10, 2022, the jury dismissed claims by Allan Shelton, agreeing with the company that the weed killer was not the source of the plaintiff's disease. Scientific references : No scientifice reference for this case. Related links : NONPARTY HUGH GRANT’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING HIS TRIAL TESTIMONY AND ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM OF LAW, January 11, 2022 Relator Non-Party Hugh Grant's Petition for Preliminary Order In And Permanent Writ of Prohibition Former Monsanto CEO files for protective order in Roundup case Former Monsanto CEO could have to testify at upcoming Roundup trial Bayer Faces Roundup Weedkiller Trial Featuring Ex-Monsanto CEO’s Testimony Monsanto on trial again – Missouri Roundup case begins Bayer wins latest Roundup cancer trial; tied 3-to-3 with plaintiffs for court wins Bayer Statement on Full Defense Verdict in Shelton