Ross Wild v. Monsanto

Reference :

VID257/2020

Complaint date :

April 16, 2020

Status :

Not judged

Place of jurisdiction :

Australia, Melbourne, Victoria

Plaintiffs types :

Individuals

Plaintiffs names :

Ross Wild, Persons who have suffered loss as a consequence of allegued exposure to Roundup and have contracted Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Defendants :

Monsanto

Lawyers for Health and Environmental Justice :

Carbone Lawyers

Case nature :

Civil court

Specificities :

Class action

Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) :

Herbicide, Glyphosate, Roundup

Requests :

Declare that Defendant is financially responsible for notifying all Class members of the link between Roundup and NHL; Compensatory and punitive damages ; awarding Plaintiffs their costs...

Name of the Court :

Federal Court of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Jurisdiction level :

Summary :

This class action represents those who have suffered loss as a consequence of allegued exposure to Roundup and have contracted Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. The class action alleges that Monsanto knew or ought to have known that Roundup was inherently unsafe and the company failed to provide suitable directions for use. On June 9, 2020, the court decides that the Wild Proceedings will be stayed until further order of the court or until reasons for judgment have been delivered at any initial trial of the McNickle Proceedings.

Scientific references :

No scientifice reference for this case.