LULAC et al. v. EPA

19-71979 // 19-71982 // 17-71636 // 14-72794
July 30, 2007
Final judgment
United States, San Francisco

Environmental NGOs, Farm/rural workers, Unions
United Farmworkers AFL-CIO, Sea Mar Community Health Center, Pineros y Campesinos Unidos del Noroeste , Beyond Pesticides, Frente Indigena de Organizaciones Binacionales, Farm Labor Organizing Committee AFL-CIO, Teamsters Local 890, Martha Rodriguez, Silvina Canez, Earthjustice, Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA), League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), California Rural Legal Assistance Foundation, Farmworkers Association of Florida, Farmworker Justice, State of New York, State of California, State of Washington, State of Maryland, State of Vermont, Commonwealth of Massachusetts,
EPA
Patti Goldman, Joshua Osborne-Klein, Kristen L. Boyles, Shelley Davis, Virginia Ruiz, Aaron Colangelo, Michael Meuter, Jonathan Gettleman, Kevin E. Regan, Marianne E. Lado, Marisa C. Ordonia

Administrative
Civil action for injunctive and declaratory relief
, Chlorpyrifos, Organophosphate
Plaintiffs ask EPA to ban the use of chlorpyrifos.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit of San Francisco, United States

April 29, 2021
Positive
EPA is ordered to ban all food uses of chlorpyrifos or retain only those uses it can find safe for workers and children. The court gave EPA 60 days from the end of the case to revoke the tolerances.

On April 29, 2021, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals orders EPA to ban all food uses of chlorpyrifos or retain only those uses it can find safe for workers and children. The court gave EPA 60 days from the end of the case to revoke the tolerances. On July 18, 2021 EPA announces that it will publish a regulation to block the use of chlorpyrifos on food, to take effect in 6 months. On Oct. 19, 2021 the American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF) filed a petition with the EPA saying the final ruling banning chlorpyrifos was bungled and should be reversed.