Beyond Pesticides et al v. Monsanto et al Reference : 17-941(TJK) Complaint date : April 7, 2017 Status : Not judged Place of jurisdiction : United States, Washington DC Plaintiffs types : Environmental NGOs, Consumer Protection Organizations Plaintiffs names : Beyond Pesticides, Organic Consumers Association (OCA) Defendants : Monsanto Lawyers for Health and Environmental Justice : Kim Richman Case nature : Civil court Specificities : Jury Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Herbicide, Roundup, Glyphosate Requests : Plaintiffs seek equitable relief on behalf of the general public, with all profits earned by Monsanto for sales of Roundup in D.C. to be deposited into a charitable fund for the raising of consumer awareness of the effects of glyphosate. Name of the Court : Superior Court of Washington DC, United States Jurisdiction level : Summary : Lawsuit is filed about the unlawful promotion, marketing, and sale of various Roundup Products, with the false statement that Roundup’s active ingredient, glyphosate, targets an enzyme that is not found “in people or pets.” 3.31.2018, judge rejected Monsanto's motion to dismiss. The case is allowed to go on with opinion published on April 30. The case is similar to 3:17-cv-00473. Scientific references : No scientifice reference for this case. Related links : Complaint. Demand for Jury Trial Memorandum Opinion, April 30 Monsanto Labeling Suit Advances in Washington Judge Rules Non-Profits Can Sue Monsanto for Misleading Labeling of Popular Herbicide Roundup