Générations Futures v. ANSES and Syngenta Reference : 2026224, 2026225 Complaint date : December 4, 2020 Status : Final judgment Place of jurisdiction : France, Montpellier Plaintiffs types : Environmental NGOs Plaintiffs names : Générations Futures Defendants : Syngenta, ANSES (Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety) Lawyers for Health and Environmental Justice : François Lafforgue, Hermine Baron Case nature : Administrative Type(s), Product(s), Active substance(s) : Herbicide, Glyphosate, Touchdown Forêt, Touchdown Système 4 Requests : Annul the decisions of September 30, 2020 by which ANSES renewed the marketing authorizations for Touchdown Système 4 and Touchdown Forêt Name of the Court : Administrative Court of Montpellier, France Jurisdiction level : Decision date : May 12, 2023 Decision nature : No description Decision content : Cancellation of the two decisions of September 30, 2020 Legal basis : Court Ruling : Link to the ruling Summary : In two rulings dated May 12, 2023, the Montpellier Administrative Court annulled the two September 30, 2020 decisions by which the French National Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health Safety (ANSES) renewed the marketing authorizations for the complete glyphosate-based formulations marketed by Syngenta: Touchdown Système 4 and Touchdown Forêt. After stating in its decisions that "It is for the judge [...] to verify that the application of the precautionary principle is justified, and then to ensure the reality of the risk assessment procedures implemented and the absence of manifest error of application" (p.5), the Administrative Court noted that in this case, several aspects had not been assessed in the absence of data submitted or data available, particularly for certain risks concerning the impact on bees and other pollinators. Furthermore, no assessment was transmitted by Syngenta concerning risks to non-target terrestrial vertebrates and arthropods via trophic interactions, despite the fact that the regulation of December 12, 2017 renewing the approval of the active substance glyphosate expressly requires particular attention to this aspect. Lastly, contrary to what ANSES maintained, it is not necessary to wait for the establishment of a standardized methodology at European level to carry out the risk assessment for the diversity and abundance of non-target terrestrial vertebrates and arthropods via trophic interactions. Thus, the Administrative Court rules that "in the absence of the implementation of a full assessment procedure, and regardless of the precautionary measures imposed, the precautionary principle has not been respected and the contested decisions disregard EU Regulation n°2017/2327 of December 12, 2017 concerning the renewal of the approval of the active substance glyphosate." (p.6). According to Attorneys Hermine Baron and François Lafforgue: "These decisions mark a turning point in the litigation of marketing authorizations, which will no longer be able to be issued without a full risk assessment, in light of the precautionary principle." Scientific references : No scientifice reference for this case. Related links : Ruling N°2026225 about Touchdown Système 4 Press release, Générations futures (2023)